The Hardball Report

           

   
Home arrow News arrow By the Numbers arrow HR/9, HR/200, HR/10, or HR/Batter Faced?
HR/9, HR/200, HR/10, or HR/Batter Faced?
 
Wednesday, 28 May 2008

Views : 137    

Favoured : None

Published in : The News, By The Numbers

Weigh in on David Pinto's suggestion of measuring HR/200 innings instead of using the more common per 9 innings. Don't just read the article. In fact, it'd be pretty pointless if you only read it. The meat of it's worth is the discussion that follows (especially since I'm voting for HR/Batter Faced).

 Recommend It 		   

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

  


Add your comment
[-] Hide form
Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.

No comment posted

< Prev   Next >